Financial Shenanigans
How to Detect Accounting Gimmicks & Fraud in Financial Reports. π΅π½ββοΈ
I don't have 30 years' experience in investments and accounting. However, it is possible to learn a lot about past history by reading several books, which will show us that during periods of euphoria, we can observe an increase in financial fraud.
In my opinion, this topic is highly relevant in this period of euphoria on the North American financial markets of 2024.
Here's a summary of a book on a very crucial subject that every investor should know about.
Why understand financial manipulation?
For decades, some companies have been manipulating their financial statements to mask underlying problems and seduce investors. As Howard M. Schilit reminds us,
βNumbers donβt lie, but the people who manipulate them often doβ
βFinancial Shenanigansβ by Howard M. Schilit is a cornerstone reference for understanding how companies manipulate their financial statements to hide underlying weaknesses or artificially enhance their performance. This book serves as a guide to develop a βfinancial detective mindsetβ π΅π½ββοΈ to detect subtle yet revealing signs of deceptive practices.
Why Financial Manipulations Exist
Publicly traded companies face relentless pressure to meet the expectations of investors and analysts. Executives strive to maintain a facade of success, often necessary to protect stock values and secure their own bonuses. This dynamic sometimes drives them to cross ethical lines and manipulate the numbers.
While financial manipulations come in many forms, they can be grouped into four broad categories:
Earnings manipulations.
Cash flow manipulations.
Distortions of key metrics.
Acquisition-related artifices.
Earnings Manipulations
Earnings manipulations are among the most common, as investors and analysts often focus exclusively on this figure. Companies use various tactics to present better results than they are actually achieving.
Premature Revenue Recognition
One of the most widespread tactics is recording revenue before it is truly earned. For example, MicroStrategy, a tech company, recorded revenue as soon as contracts were signed, even if the services hadnβt yet been delivered. This created the illusion of rapid growth, but when the fraud was uncovered, the companyβs value plummeted.
Fictitious Revenue
Some companies, like WorldCom, went even further by booking non-existent revenue. This was often achieved through circular transactions, where a company sold products to a client in exchange for reciprocal purchases or created fake entities to simulate income.
Use of Non-Sustainable Revenue
Another approach involves including non-recurring gains in revenue, such as asset sales or one-off subsidies. These gains, though legally recognized, do not reflect the companyβs regular performance and can mislead investors.
Expense Concealment
To inflate profits, some companies delay recognizing expenses, pushing them into future periods. Enron, for example, capitalized costs that should have been immediately expensed, creating an illusion of profitability while accumulating hidden financial problems.
Cash Flow Manipulations
Cash flows are often perceived as a more reliable indicator than earnings because they reflect the actual movements of cash within a company. However, cash flows are not entirely immune to manipulation. Companies can use accounting techniques to present an artificially favorable picture of their financial position.
Reclassifying Financing Cash Flows as Operating Cash Flows
One of the most common manipulations involves reclassifying cash flows from financing or investing activities as operating cash flows. This creates the impression that the company generates more cash from its core operations.
Example:
A company might include proceeds from loans or asset sales as if they were derived from operating activities. This artificially inflates operating cash flows, a key metric closely monitored by investors.
Impact:
Inflated operating cash flows often mask underlying issues, such as declining demand or poor cost management. This manipulation distorts financial ratios, such as the debt coverage ratio, misleading analysts and investors.
Shifting Operating Expenses
Some companies shift operating expenses to other categories, reducing their reported cash outflows related to core activities.
How It Works:
Recurring costs, such as maintenance or salaries, might be capitalized as investments on the balance sheet rather than recorded as immediate expenses. These costs then appear in the investing cash flows section instead of operating cash flows.
Real-Life Example:
WorldCom shifted billions of dollars in operating expenses to the investing section, creating the illusion that its revenue-generating activities were more profitable than they truly were.
Investor Impact:
Expense shifting can lead to a long-term underestimation of operational costs, making it difficult to evaluate the company's true profitability.
Artificially Inflating Operating Cash Flows
Companies may artificially inflate operating cash flows by manipulating the timing of cash receipts or including non-recurring cash inflows.
Typical Methods:
Customer Prepayments: Companies may request upfront payments for goods or services to be delivered later. These prepayments boost current cash flow but do not reflect sustainable revenue growth.
Sales to Related Entities: Companies might arrange temporary sales to affiliated entities to increase cash inflows for a specific period.
Short-Term Impact:
These practices create a perception of financial robustness, but they are unsustainable. When the prepayments must be fulfilled, or the temporary sales are reversed, the company can face a cash crunch.
Real-Life Example:
A tech company might ask major clients to pay several years of maintenance fees upfront. While this boosts short-term operating cash flows, it masks challenges in generating new revenue streams.
Divergence Between Earnings and Cash Flows
One major π© red flag for cash flow manipulation is a growing divergence between reported earnings and operating cash flows.
Why This Matters:
Earnings are more easily manipulated through accounting adjustments (e.g., revenue recognition or expense deferral).
Cash flows, although manipulable, require actual cash movements and are therefore a more reliable indicator of underlying performance.
Specific Indicators to Monitor:
Rapid growth in earnings paired with stagnant or declining cash flows.
A disproportionate increase in accounts receivable or inventory relative to revenue.
Non-Recurring or Exceptional Transactions
Unique or exceptional transactions are often used to obscure liquidity issues. These transactions are frequently presented as operating cash flows when they should not be included.
Typical Examples:
Asset Sales: A company may sell an asset to generate cash, but this event does not reflect an improvement in core operations.
One-Time Tax Benefits: Exceptional tax advantages may temporarily increase operating cash flows.
Impact on Financial Analysis:
These manipulations make it harder for investors to assess the long-term sustainability of the company's operations.
Distortion of Key Metrics
Companies increasingly rely on non-standard metrics (non-GAAP) to attract investors. While these metrics can offer useful insights, they are also easily manipulated.
Misleading Metrics
Some companies highlight flattering but unreliable metrics. Valeant Pharmaceuticals, for instance, used "cash earnings" to hide real losses. This metric excluded critical expenses like amortization, restructuring costs, and acquisition-related charges, significantly inflating profitability.
Balance Sheet Distortions
Companies can also manipulate their balance sheets to obscure challenges. Lehman Brothers used a technique called "Repo 105" to temporarily reduce liabilities before reporting quarterly results. These practices, while technically compliant with accounting rules of the time, were highly misleading to investors.
Acquisition-Related Manipulations
Due to their complexity, mergers and acquisitions provide fertile ground for financial manipulations. Companies can hide questionable practices under the guise of synergies or reorganizations.
Inflating Post-Acquisition Revenues
A common tactic is to include revenues from the acquired company in consolidated results, even if these revenues are unrelated to the acquirerβs core performance. This creates the illusion of organic growth.
Concealing Integration Costs
Costs related to integrating an acquisition, such as restructuring charges or layoffs, are often hidden or spread across multiple periods to minimize their impact.
Cash Flow Manipulations
Companies frequently combine the cash flows of the acquired company with their own to obscure declining internal cash flows.
Key Case Studies
Several iconic examples are highlighted in the book:
Enron: Used shell entities to hide debt and recognized revenue prematurely.
WorldCom: Shifted operational expenses to the investment section to inflate cash flow.
Valeant Pharmaceuticals: Misled investors with non-GAAP metrics that excluded significant expenses.
Lehman Brothers: Reduced liabilities through complex, temporary transactions ("Repo 105").
Essential Lessons for Investors: Developing Proactive Vigilance
The primary goal of investors is to safeguard their capital. Financial manipulations, though sophisticated, always leave traces. By adopting a methodical approach, investors can identify these red flags before itβs too late.
Carefully Read the Notes to Financial Statements
The most revealing information about potential manipulations often doesnβt appear in the main tables (balance sheet, income statement, cash flow statement) but in the accompanying notes. These notes disclose changes in accounting policies, unusual transactions, or redefinition of metrics.
π© Red Flags to Watch For:
β’ Frequent or unexplained changes in accounting policies. For instance, switching from recognizing revenue upon delivery to recognizing it at the time of contract signing.
β’ Transactions involving related parties (e.g., deals with affiliated customers or suppliers).
β’ Large or unusual provisions and accounting adjustments.
Practical Example:
In the case of Enron, the notes revealed transactions with off-balance-sheet entities controlled by executives. These entities were used to hide debt and transfer losses. Careful scrutiny of the notes could have raised red flags.
Be Skeptical of Non-GAAP Metrics
Companies often highlight non-GAAP metrics (those not adhering to standard accounting rules) to paint a more favorable picture of their performance. While such metrics can provide useful insights, they should be examined critically.
Key Questions to Ask:
β’ What items are excluded from the non-GAAP metrics?
β’ Are these exclusions justified or recurring?
β’ Do non-GAAP figures diverge significantly from GAAP results?
Example:
Valeant Pharmaceuticals promoted its βcash earningsβ metric while excluding significant expenses such as amortization, restructuring costs, and acquisition charges. These exclusions amounted to billions of dollars, masking significant losses and creating the illusion of profitability. Comparing these figures with GAAP results would have revealed the discrepancies.
Scrutinize Cash Flow Statements
Unlike earnings, cash flows are often considered less prone to manipulation. However, they can still be distorted through techniques like reclassification or expense shifting.
Methodology for Analysis:
β’ Compare reported earnings to operating cash flows. If earnings are growing but cash flows remain stagnant or decline, this may indicate manipulation.
β’ Look for reclassification of cash flows between operational, investing, and financing sections.
β’ Watch for operational expenses being reclassified as investments (as seen with WorldCom).
Practical Example:
At WorldCom, significant operational costs (e.g., network fees) were moved to the investment section, inflating operational cash flow. A thorough review would have uncovered this inconsistency.
Identify π© Red Flags in Financial Statements
Financial manipulations always leave traces that, when identified, can prevent significant losses.
Common Warning Signs:
β’ Revenue growth without a proportional increase in cash flows.
β’ Margins that remain unusually stable in a volatile industry.
β’ Rapid and unexplained increases in inventory or accounts receivable.
β’ Heavy reliance on non-recurring gains (e.g., asset sales, subsidies).
β’ Sudden changes in how financial results are presented.
Practical Example:
At Lehman Brothers, the βRepo 105β technique temporarily reduced liabilities each quarter. Examining debt ratios across multiple quarters would have exposed these inconsistencies.
Evaluate Governance and Audits
Poor corporate governance or complacent auditors significantly increase the risk of financial manipulation.
Assessing Governance:
β’ Does the board include independent members?
β’ Are auditors too closely tied to management?
β’ Does executive compensation encourage excessive risk-taking?
Case of Concern:
At Satyam, auditors (Pricewaterhouse Coopers) signed off on financials containing over $1 billion in fictitious cash balances. A cozy relationship between auditors and management compromised their independence.
Examine Unusual Transactions
Unusual transactions, such as purchases or sales involving related parties, should be scrutinized. These are often used to generate fictitious revenue or hide losses.
Questions to Ask:
β’ Does the transaction have a legitimate economic purpose?
β’ Are the terms consistent with market practices?
β’ Is there a circular or reciprocal flow of money?
Example:
MicroStrategy entered into a contract with NCR involving reciprocal payments. This created artificial revenue, but analyzing the terms would have revealed the lack of true economic substance.
Pay Attention to Acquisitions
Acquisitions are often used to mask weaknesses or temporarily inflate results.
What to Watch For:
β’ Are acquisition costs properly integrated into financial statements?
β’ Are the promised synergies realistic?
β’ Are combined revenues presented transparently?
Example:
Waste Management capitalized acquisition-related costs and deferred them, effectively hiding past losses. Reviewing pre- and post-acquisition financials would have exposed these adjustments.
Adopt a Long-Term Perspective
Financial manipulations are often motivated by short-term pressures, such as meeting quarterly earnings expectations. By focusing on long-term trends, investors can avoid being misled by artificially inflated performances.
Recommended Practice
Analyze financial trends over several years to identify anomalies or inconsistencies in results.
Example:
A company with rapid revenue growth but stagnant cash flows over several years likely indicates manipulation of earnings.
Summary: Becoming a Financial Detective
Investors must adopt a rigorous and critical approach when analyzing a company. Hereβs a simplified checklist to remember:
1. Always review the notes to financial statements and annual reports.
2. Compare earnings, cash flows, and balance sheets to spot inconsistencies.
3. Be cautious of non-GAAP metrics and results that seem too good to be true.
4. Look for π© red flags such as sudden accounting policy changes or unusual transactions.
5. Evaluate the companyβs governance and the independence of its auditors.
By combining these practices, investors can identify financial manipulations before they lead to losses.
Conclusion
Financial Shenanigans is an invaluable guide for anyone seeking to invest wisely. It demonstrates that vigilance, curiosity, and a healthy dose of skepticism are essential to navigating the financial markets. By learning to detect signs of manipulation, investors can avoid pitfalls and protect their capital.
Max
I would expect that supporting a rapid growth often requires significant cash...?
"A company with rapid revenue growth but stagnant cash flows over several years likely indicates manipulation of earnings."